Changes between Version 23 and Version 24 of barSoftwareErrorCorrection
- Timestamp:
- 10/26/11 08:38:09 (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
barSoftwareErrorCorrection
v23 v24 74 74 Another common difficulty is an absence of borders drawn within an outline containing multiple labels. 75 75 This can be a consequence of improper drawing but often 76 simply follows from lack of sharp transitions between structures 77 ('''see cortical areas in Figure...'''). 76 simply follows from lack of sharp transitions between structures. 78 77 When the parser detects two or more overlapping regions that were 79 78 created based on different labels such labels are changed to 80 spot labels in the CAF slide and a notification is logged. Neither79 spot labels in the CAF slide and a notification is logged. Neither 81 80 path is removed as there is no way to determine which one should be 82 81 discarded and which should be kept. After tracing, the user is notified 83 82 about ambiguous delineation and should review the slide in question 84 83 and correct it. 85 In the CAF slide on the right of figure 2 above we can see two labels (ic, Rt) located within one region. One of them was changed by parser to spot label (.ic). This particular example resulted from improper drawing and a gap existing in the border between internal capsule (ic) and reticular nucleus of the thalamus (Rt).84 In the CAF slide on the right of Figure 2 above we can see two labels (ic, Rt) located within one region. One of them was changed by parser to spot label (.ic). This particular example resulted from improper drawing and a gap existing in the border between internal capsule (ic) and reticular nucleus of the thalamus (Rt). The parser treated areas connected by the gap as one structure (''leaking of the structure'', see below). 86 85 ---- 87 86